WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "575d4356-1b9f-43a7-826b-1e84196b835e"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "2055", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2055"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002055", "sets": ["456"]}, "author_link": ["5807"], "item_3_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2011-02-28", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "9", "bibliographicPageEnd": "64", "bibliographicPageStart": "45", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "経営と制度"}]}]}, "item_3_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The purpose of this article is to show a perspective that a “theory” is regarded as an actor in practice. Traditionary, a “theory” is a model of practice, independent from practice, and does not affect to practice. It is considered as a tool for describing and understanding practice. This article surveys the MacKenzie\u0027s contribution to the study of performativity of a theory to affect practice, and criticizes the distinction of a theory and practice in his perspective. Through analyzing a case study a financial theory, “Value at Risk,” from the viewpoint of scientific sociology to research, I offer the perspective of “Theory as an actor in practice.” The relationship between a theory and practice is not mutually independent. And a theory is not a map of practice, but a part of practice.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_3_publisher_33": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "首都大学東京大学院社会科学研究科経営学専攻経営学会"}]}, "item_3_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11960598", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13491180", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_3_version_type_16": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "城田, 剛"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "5807", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2016-08-03"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "20004-09-003.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.8 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1800000.0, "url": {"label": "20004-09-003.pdf", "url": "https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2055/files/20004-09-003.pdf"}, "version_id": "0d22408d-0fe1-4b7d-8082-88b0e4cf61f7"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "実践におけるアクターとしての理論 : 金融工学理論VaR(Value at Risk)のケース", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "実践におけるアクターとしての理論 : 金融工学理論VaR(Value at Risk)のケース"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "3", "path": ["456"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/10748/4241", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2011-09-28"}, "publish_date": "2011-09-28", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2055", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["実践におけるアクターとしての理論 : 金融工学理論VaR(Value at Risk)のケース"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
実践におけるアクターとしての理論 : 金融工学理論VaR(Value at Risk)のケース
http://hdl.handle.net/10748/4241
http://hdl.handle.net/10748/424187900854-e375-49e1-86be-6c8cd050151d
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
20004-09-003.pdf (1.8 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-09-28 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 実践におけるアクターとしての理論 : 金融工学理論VaR(Value at Risk)のケース | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
城田, 剛
× 城田, 剛 |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The purpose of this article is to show a perspective that a “theory” is regarded as an actor in practice. Traditionary, a “theory” is a model of practice, independent from practice, and does not affect to practice. It is considered as a tool for describing and understanding practice. This article surveys the MacKenzie's contribution to the study of performativity of a theory to affect practice, and criticizes the distinction of a theory and practice in his perspective. Through analyzing a case study a financial theory, “Value at Risk,” from the viewpoint of scientific sociology to research, I offer the perspective of “Theory as an actor in practice.” The relationship between a theory and practice is not mutually independent. And a theory is not a map of practice, but a part of practice. | |||||
書誌情報 |
経営と制度 号 9, p. 45-64, 発行日 2011-02-28 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13491180 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11960598 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 首都大学東京大学院社会科学研究科経営学専攻経営学会 |