{"created":"2023-06-19T12:45:55.007330+00:00","id":5801,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"947d17d8-12ed-4d04-b577-eba13351a877"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"5801","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5801"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005801","sets":["521:613:616:763:1337"]},"author_link":["19288","19290","19289","19291"],"item_3_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Conservation of Housing Environment and its Evaluation by the Residents in Detached Residence Area : A Case Study in Tama City"}]},"item_3_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2001","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"130","bibliographicPageStart":"117","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"74","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"総合都市研究"}]}]},"item_3_creator_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Kawakita, Hiroyuki"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"19290","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Fukuoka, Shunji"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"19291","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_3_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では、多摩ニュータウン開発においてはじめて導入された一人方式の建築協定をとりあげ、開発事業者及び地元自治体の政策的意図やその効果としての住環境保全の実態と、これに対する地区居住者による評価を行おうとするものである。その際、建築協定による規制を受けた地区居住者の評価と、このような規制がなされていない地区とのそれを比較分析して、土地利用に関わる規制手法の実効性と有効性を検証しようと試みた。具体的には、公的事業者による宅地分譲の際の公募条件として課せられる建築協定による住環境保全の適用を受けた多摩ニュータウン事業区域内の特定地区の居住者と適用のない区画整理地区のそれぞれの実態調査と、両地区の居住者による意識調査結果の比較分析とを通じて、その実効性と有効性について考察した。併せて、多摩ニュータウン事業区域内において地区計画や建築協定が果たしている機能と、その地区レベルの住宅まちづくりにおける効果や限界を検討した。本研究により、住宅地における土地利用規制と住環境保全との関係が建築協定による一種の社会的規制として、居住者の意識によっても自主的かつ積極的に支えられていることが明らかとなった。また、一人建築協定による住環境形成と保全が多摩ニュータウン事業区域外の隣接地区居住者の意識にまで一定の良い影響を与えるという開発者の意図せざる効果を生んでいる点も指摘した。そこで、それは今後の住環境に対する相互規制の維持についても居住者の自主的・主体的対応の可能性を示唆するものとなっている。さらに本研究では、この一人建築協定の策定手法が将来の良好な住宅地の供給に応用できる手法であることを示すことができた。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"This paper focuses on as ingle-party building agreement, a type of agreement concluded in case when there is only one developer/land owner in a development project. This agreement was first introduced in the development of Tama New Town in Tama City. The purpose of the paper is to examine political intention of developers and the local government in introducing this concept, its effect on protecting the housing environment and its evaluation by local residents. Evaluation by residents living in districts with and without a building agreement was compared to examine effectiveness of the land use control method. First, opinion surveys on two types of residents living in the developed districts of Tama New Town(project districts) were conducted. Residents were classified into; a) those living in specified districts where a building agreement, a prerequisite for public-sector developers when they sell building lots, is imposed and; b) those living in districts developed through land readjustment and where no building agreement exists. Results of the two surveys were then compared. At the same time roles of district plan and building agreement in the project districts and their effects and limits in housing and community planning in the district were examined. Comparison of two types of residents has indicated that the building agreement is supported by the residents and is functioning as a social control in maintaining residential land use and protecting the housing environment. The paper also pointed out that the single-party building agreement had a positive far-reaching and interactive influence on the awareness of residents in. the neighboring districts by protecting and creating quality housing environment within the project districts. This positive influence was not expected by the developer and indicates residents' willingness to help with each other in protecting their own housing environment. When a developer imposes a single-party building agreement target at the entire group of residents before selling the residential lots, residents become aware of the importance of housing environment from the beginning and norms are fostered to protect their residential lots which are public space by nature. The norms then work to conserve quality housing environment. These findings indicate that a planning tool of single-party agreement is more widely applicable to future development projects to increase the supply of quality residential lots. ","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_3_description_40":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"postprint","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京都立大学都市研究センター"}]},"item_3_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00134354","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"03863506","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_3_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"川喜田, 洋敬"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"福岡, 峻治"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-04-14"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"20024-074-008.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"860.4 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"20024-074-008.pdf","url":"https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5801/files/20024-074-008.pdf"},"version_id":"982a4027-ef00-47ee-88f6-350de424af21"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"住環境の維持・保全","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"居住者","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"戸建て住宅地","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"一人建築協定","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"多摩市","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Conservation of Housing Environment","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Resident","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Detached Residence Area","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Single-party Building Agreement","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Tama City","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"住宅地における住環境の維持・保全と居住者の対応 : 多摩市の分譲宅地と区画整理宅地を事例として","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"住宅地における住環境の維持・保全と居住者の対応 : 多摩市の分譲宅地と区画整理宅地を事例として"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"3","path":["1337"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2017-05-01"},"publish_date":"2017-05-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"5801","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["住宅地における住環境の維持・保全と居住者の対応 : 多摩市の分譲宅地と区画整理宅地を事例として"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-19T17:04:24.750107+00:00"}