{"created":"2023-06-19T12:41:18.420069+00:00","id":349,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3c0eae21-6500-437d-ad30-c0121f5fde1f"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"349","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"349"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000349","sets":["99:130:166"]},"author_link":["1981","1983","1982"],"item_5_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"New and Old Eugenics and Comparative History of Japan and Germany with Regard to Criticism of the Nazi Sterilization Law : Reconsideration of Raicho Hiratsuka Eugenism"}]},"item_5_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2008-02-26","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"291","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographic_titles":[{}]}]},"item_5_creator_2":{"attribute_name":"著者(ヨミ)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"オカダ, エミコ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1982","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_5_creator_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Okada, Emiko"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1983","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_5_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"1990年代から「平塚らいてうは優生思想の持ち主」論が流布している。しかし、その説の典拠はあいまいで、史資料の誤った引用が目立つ。平塚はたしかに優生思想の持ち主であるが、断種法制定運動を率いたわけではな、いからだ。本研究では、いつ頃から、どのようにして、平塚が優生思想に親近感を持つのかの解明を、主目的とする。III部構成である。 I部「平塚らいてうの優生思想形成過程-大澤謙二・永井潜の『反』フェミニズムとの対比を通して」では、日独の結婚制限・断種法情報比較から、若き平塚の優生思想形成過程を追う。平塚は日本女子大学校時代に東大医学部生理学教室初代教授の大澤謙二講義を聴く。大澤の後継者である永井も、同時期に大澤講義を通して結婚制限に研究関心を待つことが明らかにされる。 II部「断糎法制定(国民優生法)に至る動き」では、永井に代表される東大医学部の一群が、ナチ断種法に傾倒していく経緯を年表で提示し、それが平塚のフェミニズムに依拠する優生思想とは異なることを示す。 III部「戦後優生思想の読みかえと隠蔽・忘却」では、優生保護怯制定時の平塚(1949)と永井(1948/49)の原稿を比べ、永井は「反」フェミニズムの姿勢を貫き、かつ彼の優生学テキストは戦後も変化がない点を明らかにする。研究成果は三点である。1.1990年代に流布する「平塚は優生思想の持ち主」論を批判し、「母性主義フェミニズム」とは別の平塚フェミニズム論の新たな可能性を探った。2.東大教授永井が優生学研究と断種法制定運動に没頭する理由が明らかにされた。3.日独比較を機軸にする優生学の歴史研究方法論のモデル例が示された。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"Since the 1990s, Raicho Hiratsuka was considered to be a eugenicist; however, the accusation is not backed up, and there are many misquotes from historical materials. Hiratsuka was considered to be a eugenicist, yet she never led the movement to establish the sterilization law. The purpose of this study Is to discover when Hiratsuka started feeling an affinity toward eugenism. It consists of three parts. Part I, \"Formulation Process of Ralcho Hiratsuka's Eugenism : Through Comparison with Anti-Feminism by Kenji Osawa and Hisomu Nagai\" unscrambles the formulation process of the eugenism of young Hiratsuka by comparing Japanese and German marriage restrictions and sterilization laws. At Japan Women's University, she attended lectures of Osawa, the first professor in the Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo University. Nagai, Osawa's successor, was intrigued by marriage restrictions, which were part of Osawa's lectures at this time. Part II \"Movement to Establish the Sterilization Law (National Eugenic Law) \" explains how a group from the Faculty of Medicine in Tokyo University began devoting themselves to the Nazi sterilization law by using a chronologic table, and shows that it is different from Hiratsuka's eugenism, which is based on feminism. Part III, \"Intentional Misinterpretation, Cover-Up, and Oblivion of Post-War Eugenism\" compares the drafts by Hiratsuka (1949) and Nagai (1948/1949) at the time of the Eugenic Protection Law, and indicates that Nagai adhered to the anti-feminism idea and his eugenic texts remained unchanged after the war. The study's accomplishments are 1. Criticizing the theory of Hiratsuka being a eugenicist, and studying the possibility of Hiratsuka's feminism theory, which is different from maternal feminism. 2. Showing why Nagai devoted himself to eugenic study and the movement to establish the sterilization law. 3. Showing a model of the methodology of historical study centered around comparison of eugenics between Japan and Germany.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_5_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"科学研究費補助金研究成果報告書, 課題番号17530422, 2005年度～2007年度, 基盤研究(C)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_5_relation_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"BA86299525","subitem_relation_type_select":"NCID"}}]},"item_5_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"岡田, 英己子"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"1981","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2016-08-02"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"10012-001.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"24.8 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"10012-001.pdf","url":"https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/349/files/10012-001.pdf"},"version_id":"6d1f5f2e-e51e-4750-9233-e17b393ca840"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"research report","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws"}]},"item_title":"新・旧優生学とナチ断種法批判に関する日独比較史-平塚らいてうの優生思想の再考から","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"新・旧優生学とナチ断種法批判に関する日独比較史-平塚らいてうの優生思想の再考から"}]},"item_type_id":"5","owner":"3","path":["166"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2010-11-29"},"publish_date":"2010-11-29","publish_status":"0","recid":"349","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["新・旧優生学とナチ断種法批判に関する日独比較史-平塚らいてうの優生思想の再考から"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-19T19:19:37.305931+00:00"}