{"created":"2023-06-19T12:42:28.736735+00:00","id":1675,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"4e107a3d-4dbe-4f06-a25c-aaee1f05f4c0"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"1675","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1675"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001675","sets":["411:412:414:415:416"]},"author_link":["4898","4899","4900"],"item_3_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Ob die Hypothek auf ein Gebaude erlischt, wenn dieses Gebaude enteignet und der daraus entstandene Entschadigungsanspruch des Hypothekenschuldners von einem Anderen gepfandet und diesem uberwiesen ist. Diese Frage wurde in einem Urteil des 3. Senates des"}]},"item_3_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2003-07-15","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"449","bibliographicPageStart":"435","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"44","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"東京都立大学法学会雑誌"}]}]},"item_3_creator_2":{"attribute_name":"著者(ヨミ)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"エンドウ, アユム"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"4899","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_3_creator_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Endo, Ayumu"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"4900","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_3_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京都立大学法学部"}]},"item_3_relation_42":{"attribute_name":"関係URI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004476085"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004476085","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_3_rights_13":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"本文データは学協会の許諾に基づきCiNiiから複製したものである"}]},"item_3_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00163975","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"03868745","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_3_text_37":{"attribute_name":"編者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"東京都立大学法学会"}]},"item_3_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"遠藤, 歩"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"4898","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2016-08-03"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"20006-44(1)-011.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"20006-44(1)-011.pdf","url":"https://tokyo-metro-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1675/files/20006-44(1)-011.pdf"},"version_id":"93570abb-7931-44ab-a162-0e43962530b4"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"抵当権の物上代位の目的となる債権に対する転付命令の効力 : 最高裁平成一四年三月一二日第三小法廷判決(平成一二年(受)第八九〇号配当異議事件)[民集五六巻三号五五五頁、裁時一三一一号六頁、判時一七八五号三五頁、判タ一〇九一号六八頁、金融法務一六四八号五三頁、金融商事一一四八号三頁](東京都立大学民事判例研究会)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"抵当権の物上代位の目的となる債権に対する転付命令の効力 : 最高裁平成一四年三月一二日第三小法廷判決(平成一二年(受)第八九〇号配当異議事件)[民集五六巻三号五五五頁、裁時一三一一号六頁、判時一七八五号三五頁、判タ一〇九一号六八頁、金融法務一六四八号五三頁、金融商事一一四八号三頁](東京都立大学民事判例研究会)"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"3","path":["416"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2010-11-30"},"publish_date":"2010-11-30","publish_status":"0","recid":"1675","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["抵当権の物上代位の目的となる債権に対する転付命令の効力 : 最高裁平成一四年三月一二日第三小法廷判決(平成一二年(受)第八九〇号配当異議事件)[民集五六巻三号五五五頁、裁時一三一一号六頁、判時一七八五号三五頁、判タ一〇九一号六八頁、金融法務一六四八号五三頁、金融商事一一四八号三頁](東京都立大学民事判例研究会)"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-06-19T15:09:38.146500+00:00"}